When AML Audits Knock: Red Flags Fintech SMEs Need to Catch Early

South African fintechs are no strangers to compliance panic. The country is still on the FATF grey list and will only know in October 2025 whether the watchdog is satisfied that all 22 action items have been stuck. Banks do not want another stern letter from international correspondents, so they have started leaning hard on their payment-startup partners. If you plug into a bank’s rails, the expectation is that your onboarding checks are watertight and that your reporting clock starts the moment a suspicious payment pings.

So, what actually flips a routine KYC review into enhanced due diligence for a small fintech? The short version is patterns that look out of place for the customer’s stated profile. Think first use of large cash deposits after months of quiet card transactions, sudden routing of funds to or from a country that is on any sanctions list round amounts that line up too neatly with invoice values high velocity transfers that slice one big payment into many small ones, incoming wires from a crypto off ramp that land directly in a personal wallet and accounts linked to high risk sectors such as private security cash intensive retail or scrap metal. The second you spot any one of those quirks, your team should tag the account, elevate authentication questions and demand documentary proof that matches the new behaviour.

Politically exposed persons need a different lens because titles often hide in plain sight. Your sign-up flow should flag any name field that contains watch phrases like Honourable Hon Councillor, Cllr, Mayor, MP, MEC, Premier Ambassador, General, Sheikh, Colonel, Archbishop, Reverend, Imam, Chief Princess or the Swazi title Inkhosikati. Combine that with automated screening against the South African PEP list, the UN Security Council sanctions list and any local law enforcement notices. If a new customer appears on more than one of those databases, you switch to senior management approval before activation, and you keep their activity under continuous monitoring.

Lawyers and investors usually fight over the wording of the statutory reporting duty. A clause that lands somewhere in the middle reads like this: The parties acknowledge that the company and its officers are bound by the Financial Intelligence Centre Act. The company will file suspicious transaction reports in good faith and only to the extent required by applicable law.

The Money Laundering Reporting Officer will inform the board or its audit committee within seven days of any filing, except where the Act forbids such disclosure. No other announcement or disclosure shall be made without the prior written consent of the board unless a competent authority directs otherwise. This language shows investors that you are not volunteering secrets to the regulator, yet it still protects the founders from personal liability.

The best time to hard bake these rules is before the first customer funds clear. If the country exits the grey list, the pressure will ease, but the habit of ironclad onboarding and quick-fire reporting will remain a competitive edge for any fintech that wants to keep access to bank infrastructure and international capital.

The StartUp Legal offers expert legal services tailored for SMEs, helping you secure a winning edge. For personalised support, book a complimentary consultation: https://calendar.app.google/tWhCzbMBUu1DeVLR7 or email us at hello@thestartuplegal.co.za.